Sunday, 18 August 2013

(Audio) SENIOR OFFICIAL: ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN

Israel Radio News Broadcast 08:00 6 August 2013
ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN
[Translation by IMRA]

For audio:
http://youtu.be/b5k9Y0yStAs

Voice of Israel from Jerusalem. Good morning, the hour is 8:00 and the
following is the news from Malachi Chizkiya:

A senior source in Israel doubts the intentions of the American
administration to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.at all costs.

The source told our diplomatic commentator Chico Menashe that the behavior
of the administration towards Syria contradicts the declarations of
President Obama and teaches Israel that it cannot rely on American promises.

The state source added that Israel can carry out a military operation
against Iran also without American military support but such an action would
be of a lower quality than an American action.

Our commentator notes that in Israel there is concern that direct
negotiations will open between Washington and Teheran that will bring to an
easing of sanctions in exchange for Iranian concessions that will not meet
the demands set by Israel.


View the original article here

Thursday, 8 August 2013

July Peace Index: Support national referendum, oppose deal

The Peace Index ? July 2013
(N=602), 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the Arab sector
28?30.7.2013
http://www.peaceindex.org/files/The%20Peace%20Index%20Data%20%20July%202013(2).pdf

1. What is your position on holding peace negotiations between Israel and
the
Palestinian Authority?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly in favor 35.8 (29.5) [71.6]
2. Somewhat in favor 29.9 (31.8) [19.3]
3. Somewhat opposed 9.2 (10.4) [2.6]
4. Strongly opposed 19.9 (22.7) [3.6]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.2 (5.6) [2.9]

2. Do you believe or not believe that negotiations between Israel and the
Palestinian Authority will lead to peace between Israel and the Palestinians
in the coming years?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly believe 6.6 (4.5) [18.4]
2. Somewhat believe 23.7 (21.2) [38.3]
3. Somewhat don?t believe 23.0 (22.9) [23.7]
4. Don?t believe at all 42.6 (47.5) [14.9]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.0 (3.9) [4.7]

3. If a peace agreement is reached with the Palestinians that includes an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements,
in your opinion, would there or would there not be a need for a national
referendum to approve the agreement, or should the decision be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There is a need for a referendum 63.5 (62.0) [71.9]
2. There is no need for a referendum. The decision should be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset 31.9 (33.9) [20.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.7 (4.1) [8.1]

4. If a referendum is held, do you think that all Israeli citizens without
distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum? Or should this right be limited to Jewish citizens only?

General Public (Jews [Arabs]
1. All citizens, Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum 52.1 (45.8) [87.8]
2. Only Jewish citizens should have the right to vote in the referendum
41.9 (48.6) [3.9]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.0 (5.6) [8.3]

5. If a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli citizens, Jews
and Arabs, in your assessment would there or would there not be majority
support of a peace agreement with the Palestinians that would include an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There would be majority support of the agreement 33.7 (29.4)
[58.2]
2. There would not be majority support of the agreement 54.3 (58.0)
[33.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 12.0 (12.5) [8.8]

6. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry recently achieved a breakthrough and
convinced the Israelis and the Palestinians to begin a negotiation process
in Washington under US sponsorship. What, in your opinion, are the chances
that the renewed negotiations will lead to a peace agreement between the two
sides?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very high chances 4.7 (2.7) [16.3]
2. Moderately high chances 17.6 (15.4) [30.3]
3. Moderately low chances 37.2 (39.4) [24.3]
4. Very low chances 36.2 (39.7) [16.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.3 (2.8) [12.8]

7. Does the Palestinian Authority truly want to resume peace negotiations
or not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 13.7 (6.2) [56.0]
2. I think it wants to 23.9 (23.0) [29.2]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 24.1 (27.6) [4.1]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 31.8 (36.4) [5.8]
5. Don?t know / No answer 6.4 (6.7) [4.9]

8. Does the Israeli government truly want to resume peace negotiations or
not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 25.0 (22.9) [36.8]
2. I think it wants to 37.5 (40.3) [21.5]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 20.1 (20.3) [19.2]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 11.6 (11.2) [14.2]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.8 (5.3) [8.3]

9. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that
Israel?s security will be ensured?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 19.3 (21.6) [6.0]
2. Moderately trust 36.2 (38.5) [23.2]
3. Don?t trust so much 22.8 (20.5) [36.1]
4. Don?t trust at all 18.4 (16.8) [27.4]
5. Don?t know / No answer 3.3 (2.6) [7.2]

10. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that,
to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace treaty will be signed?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 13.9 (15.6) [4.0]
2. Moderately trust 31.6 (32.2) [27.8]
3. Don?t trust so much 27.4 (26.7) [31.3]
4. Don?t trust at all 21.8 (20.7) [28.1]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.4 (4.8) [8.8]

11. If Israel and the Palestinians reach an understanding and a permanent
peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and declaration
of the end of the conflict by the Palestinians, in return for this peace
agreement, would you support or not support each of the following?

11.1 Withdrawal to the 1967 borders with territorial swaps

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 38.4 (32.4) [72.1]
2. Would not support 55.5 (62.5) [15.4]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.2 (5.1) [12.5]

11.2 Transfer of the Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian
Authority, and a special arrangement for the holy places

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 43.9 (42.1) [54.6]
2. Would not support 47.6 (50.3) [32.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 8.5 (7.6) [13.2]

11.3 An evacuation of settlements, except for Ariel, Maaleh Adumim, and the
settlement blocs

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 44.3 (40.0) [68.7]
2. Would not support 51.8 (57.6) [19.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 3.9 (2.4) [12.1]

11.4 Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, permitting the
return of a small number of Palestinian refugees and financial compensation
for others

General Public (Jews)
[Arabs]
1. Would support 28.4 (18.8) [82.8]
2. Would not support 66.7 (76.7) [9.6]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.9 (4.5) [7.6]

12. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Labor Party join the Netanyahu government immediately to
support the process from within?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 25.9 (20.6) [56.2]
2. I think it should 25.4 (27.3) [14.9]
3. I think it should not 17.9 (19.7) [7.9]
4. I?m sure it should not 13.8 (16.1) [1.0]
5. Don?t know / No answer 16.9 (16.3) [20.0]

13. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Habayit Hayehudi party headed by Naftali Bennett leave the
government immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if
successful, will undoubtedly entail the evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 20.1 (19.7) [22.1]
2. I think it should 14.0 (13.2) [18.9]
3. I think it should not 23.2 (23.5) [21.6]
4. I?m sure it should not 24.4 (27.3) [8.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 18.2 (16.3) [29.1]

14. When you think about the recent elections for the Chief Rabbinate, how
would you characterize them on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ?very clean?
and 5 being ?very corrupt??

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very clean 6.2 (6.8) [2.7]
2. 5.1 (5.0) [5.6]
3. Medium 24.2 (23.2) [29.9]
4. 14.9 (14.0) [20.1]
5. Very corrupt 25.9 (27.6) [16.6]
6. Don?t know / No answer 23.7 (23.5) [25.2]

15. What effect will the results of the Chief Rabbinate elections have on
the status of the Chief Rabbinate in eyes of the Jewish population as a
whole?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. It will not have an effect 29.2 (31.3) [17.2]
2. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will increase 19.3 (19.1) [20.6]
3. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will decrease 25.4 (26.9) [16.8]
4. Don?t know / No answer 26.1 (22.7) [45.4]

The Peace Index: July 2 2013

Date Published: 06/08/2013
Survey dates: 28/07/2013 - 30/07/2013
The July Index
http://www.peaceindex.org/indexMonthEng.aspx?num=254

Assessing the chances of the peace talks ? U.S. Secretary of State John
Kerry?s success in achieving a breakthrough and convincing Israeli and
Palestinian decision-makers to resume peace talks has not convinced the
majority of the Israeli Jewish public that the renewed negotiations will
lead to a peace agreement. Only about one-fifth (18%) rate the chances of
the talks producing a peace agreement as high or very high, while the
majority (80%) sees the chances as moderately low or very low. The Arab
public is much more optimistic, though here too doubts are considerable: 47%
assess the chances of getting to a peace agreement as high or very high
compared to 41% who view them as low or very low. A segmentation of the
responses of the Jewish public by voting in the recent Knesset elections
shows that only among Meretz voters is there a majority (65%) that sees high
or very high chances that the talks will bear fruit.

The sincerity of the sides ? The Jewish public?s high level of pessimism
about the negotiations? chances of success is undoubtedly connected to its
widespread opinion (64%) that the Palestinian leadership does not genuinely
want to resume these talks. Regarding the Israeli government, the response
of the Jewish public is in the opposite direction: 63% say the Israeli
government really does want to resume the talks. On this question, too, the
Arab public is more optimistic about both leaderships: a large majority
(85%) of the Arab public is sure or thinks that the Palestinian leadership
sincerely wants to resume peace talks; a smaller majority (58%) thinks or is
sure this is true of the Israeli government as well. A segmentation by
voting shows that the highest rate of those believing that the Israeli
government is sincere is found among Yesh Atid voters (73%). Regarding the
sincerity of the Palestinian side, only among Meretz voters does a majority
believe that the Palestinian Authority is sincere (76.5%).

Netanyahu?s conduct of the negotiations ? It appears that the Jewish public
makes a distinction between the position of the Israeli government and the
motives of the prime minister. A majority (60%) indeed trusts Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu to conduct the negotiations such that Israel?s security
will be safeguarded. But when asked whether Netanyahu will conduct the
negotiations such that ?to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace
treaty will be signed,? the Jewish public splits into two equal camps: 48%
trust him on this score and 47% do not. The Arab public does not trust
Netanyahu in either regard: 63.5% do not trust him to conduct the
negotiations such that Israel?s security will be ensured, and 59% do not
trust him to conduct the negotiation such that, to the extent that it
depends on Israel, the talks will lead to peace.

Readiness for concessions ? The findings of this survey indicate that the
positions of the Jewish public on the terms of a peace agreement do not bode
well for the chances of the negotiations? success. Even given the terms that
we presented??Israel and the Palestinians will reach an understanding and a
permanent peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and a Palestinian
declaration of the end of the conflict??the majority of Jewish respondents,
to different extents, is not prepared to concede to the Palestinians on any
of the four problems that stand at the heart of the conflict. Some 77%
oppose Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, with a small
number of Palestinian refugees being allowed to return and financial
compensation for others; 62.5% oppose a withdrawal to the 1967 borders with
land swaps; 58% oppose evacuating settlements except for Ariel, Maaleh
Adumim, and the settlement blocs; and 50% oppose transferring the Arab
neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special
arrangement for the holy places. Among these four no?s, the greatest
opposition is on the issue of the right of return and the least is on the
Jerusalem issue. In the Arab public there is (variable) majority support for
concessions on all four of the issues, with the largest majority supporting
Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return while offering the
possibility of a limited number of refugees to return to Israel (82%), and
the smallest majority (55%) supporting the transfer of Arab neighborhoods of
Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special arrangement for the
holy places. The latter finding may be because some of the respondents are
Arab residents of East Jerusalem who do not want to be under PA sovereignty.

Support for a referendum ? In the past, we have always found majority
support for a referendum to ratify a peace agreement, should one be
attained. This time we also asked if a peace agreement is reached that
includes a withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of
settlements, is there a need to approve it in a referendum or should the
decision be left to the government and the Knesset? This time, as in the
past, a clear majority of the Jewish public (62%) affirmed that if peace is
reached a referendum should be held. In the Arab public, the rate of support
for a referendum is even higher at 72%.

Who should take part in the referendum? On the question of whether all
Israeli citizens without distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the
right to vote in the referendum, opinions among Jewish respondents are
divided between those who support granting the right to everyone (46%) and a
slightly higher rate who think that only Jewish citizens should be granted
the right to vote in the referendum (49%). Among the Arabs, a very large
majority (88%) think the right to vote in the referendum should be given to
all Israeli citizens. A segmentation of the answers of Jewish respondents by
voting in the latest Knesset elections reveals that only among Kadima,
Labor, and Meretz voters does a majority support giving the right to all
Israeli citizens without distinction (54.5%, 64%, and 83% respectively). A
segmentation of the responses by self-definition of religiosity in the
Jewish public turned up large disparities: only 13% of those who defined
themselves as Haredim favor participation of all citizens in the referendum,
33% of religious respondents, 31% of religious-traditional respondents, 46%
of nonreligious-traditional respondents, and 60% of secular respondents.

Likely results of the referendum ? The prevailing opinion in the Jewish
public (58%) is that if a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli
citizens, Jews and Arabs, there would not be majority support for a peace
agreement that includes an Israeli withdrawal from the territories and
evacuation of settlements. In the Arab public, however, exactly the same
rate thinks that if a referendum of all citizens were to be held, there
would be majority support for a peace agreement. A cross-tabulation of the
responses of the Jewish public regarding the anticipated referendum results
and their responses regarding who should participate in the referendum shows
that of those who think that a majority would support the agreement, the
majority (57%) support the participation of all Israeli citizens?including
Arabs?in the referendum. However, among those who think that a majority
would not support the agreement if all Israeli citizens took part in the
referendum, only 40% support Arab participation in the referendum.

Join or quit the government because of peace talks? ? A plurality (48%) of
the Jewish public (vs. 35%) thinks that the Labor Party should join the
Netanyahu government immediately so as to support the effort to reach a
peace agreement from within. Seventy-one percent of the Arab public thinks
the same. Among those voters who voted for Labor in the recent elections,
68% think Labor should join the government immediately for this purpose.
However, only a minority of the Jewish public (33%) thinks that the Habayit
Hayehudi party, headed by Naftali Bennett, should leave the government
immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if successful, will
undoubtedly entail evacuating settlements. Among Arab respondents, the
highest rate (41%) would want Habayit Hayehudi to leave the government;
their main motivation, however, is most likely not the motivation presented
in the question but rather a desire to weaken the right-wing nature of the
government. A segmentation of the responses of Habayit Hayehudi voters to
this question shows a problematic internal division: 46% are in favor of
leaving the government immediately while 49% are against it.

The elections for the Chief Rabbinate ? Things happen so fast in Israel that
thee elections for the Chief Rabbinate may already seem to be history.
Still, it is noteworthy that according to the results of the survey, only
12% of the Jewish public think the latest elections to the Chief Rabbinate
were ?clean,? 23% placed them midway between clean and corrupt, while the
majority (42%) characterized them as corrupt. (About 25%, an especially high
rate in our surveys, said that they did not know or declined to answer the
question.) As for how the elections for Chief Rabbi will influence the
status of the institution of the Chief Rabbinate, 31% think the elections
will not have an influence, 27% believe the status of the Chief Rabbinate
will be weakened by the elections, and 19% expect the status of the Chief
Rabbinate to be strengthened. (Again about one-fourth did not know or
declined to respond.)

The Negotiations Index for July, 2013
The Peace Index project includes ongoing monitoring of the Israeli public's
attitudes towards peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority. The monthly Negotiation Index is comprised of two questions, one
focusing on public support for peace negotiations and the other on the
degree to which the public believes that such talks will actually lead to
peace. The aggregated replies to these two questions are calculated,
combined, and standardized on a scale of 0-100, in which 0 represents total
lack of support for negotiations and lack of belief in their potential to
bear fruit, and 100 represents total support for the process and belief in
its potential. Each month, the Negotiations Index presents two distinct
findings, one for the general Israeli population and the other for Jewish
Israelis.

Negotiations Index: General sample: 46.4; Jewish sample: 42.3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Peace Index is a project of the Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict
Resolution at Tel Aviv University and the Israel Democracy Institute. The
survey was conducted by telephone on July 28-30, 2013, by the Midgam
Research Institute. The survey was conducted in Hebrew, Arabic, and Russian
and included 602 respondents, 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the
Arab sector. A calculation was done such that the total of the respondents
would constitute a representative national sample of the adult population
aged 18 and over. The margin of error is ? 4.5%.


View the original article here

My World Facts

Posted by Professor Cram in _Subject Review

Learn the capitals and currencies of countries around the world with these flashcards. You can even study while you play a concentration game, too!

ShareChapter: _Subject Review
Tags: Africa, Asian, Capitals, Currencies, Europe, My World Facts, North America, Pacific Rim, South America, World Facts, World Facts: My World Facts, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

My World Flags

Posted by Professor Cram in World Flags

Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and the Pacific Rim are all in here. Learn the flags of the world with these useful flash cards.

ShareChapter: World Flags
Tags: Africa, Europe, Middle East, My World Flags, North America, Pacific Rim, South America, World Facts, World Facts: My World Flags, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

Flags of Europe

Posted by Professor Cram in World Flags

Think you can identify the national flags of the European continent? Have fun with this quiz covering the flags of Europe, from the Russian Republic to the Iberian peninsula.

ShareChapter: World Flags
Tags: Europe, Flags, Flags of Europe, World Facts, World Facts: Flags of Europe, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

Iranian President Rohani, Turkish PM Erdogan talk on phone

President Rohani, Turkey's Erdogan talk on the phone
Date: 05/08/2013 Time: 22:19
http://217.25.54.55/en/News/80763880/Politic/President_Rohani,_Turkey's_Erdogan_talk_on_the_phone:

Tehran, Aug 5, IRNA – President Hassan Rohani, in a telephone conversation
with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Teyyip Erdogan on Monday, said all should
do their best to establish peace and stability in the region.

According to Presidential Office Website, Rohani thanked Erdogan for his
call and said,' Based on our Islamic and human obligations, we should all
try hard to stop bloodshed in the region.'

'Cooperation between Iran and Turkey would be very effective in performing
our Islamic and human duties,' said the president.

'Iran's new government would take big steps to broaden relations with Turkey
on bilateral, regional and international levels,' added President Rohani.

Prime Minister Erdogan, on behalf of himself, government and people of
Turkey, congratulated Rohani on his election as the new president of Iran
and expressed his interest to visit Tehran.

Referring to Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu's presence in Tehran
to participate in President Rohani's oath-taking ceremony, Erdogan called
for more development in Teharn, Ankara relations.

The two officials also congratulated each other in adavance, on the advent
of Eid al-Fitr, marking the end of holy month of Ramazan.

1771**1771


View the original article here

Flags of Africa

Posted by Professor Cram in World Flags

Think you can identify the national flags of the African continent? Have fun with this quiz covering the flags of the different countries in Africa.

ShareChapter: World Flags
Tags: Africa, Flags, Flags of Africa, World Facts, World Facts: Flags of Africa, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

World Currencies Quiz

Posted by Professor Cram in World Currencies

How well do you know your world currencies? Try your hand with this fun quiz — ten questions randomly selected from countries across the globe!

ShareChapter: World Currencies
Tags: Africa, Americas, Asia, Currencies, Europe, Middle East, Pacific Rim, World Currencies Quiz, World Facts, World Facts: World Currencies Quiz, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

Flags of the Americas

Posted by Professor Cram in World Flags

Think you can identify the national flags of the western hemisphere? Have fun with this quiz covering the flags of North America, South America, Central America, and the Caribbean Sea.

ShareChapter: World Flags
Tags: Americas, Flags, World Facts: Flags of the Americas, World History

Click one of these links to get more help from another Cramlet in this same chapter:


View the original article here

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the Temple Mount would be shared

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the
Temple Mount would be shared
Interviewed on IDF Radio 5 August 2013
[IMRA translation]
http://youtu.be/DrwoOwh9mXU

Program host Razi Barkai: With an area of 144 dunam, in contrast to the
very small area of the Western Wall Plaza, where it is be possible to make a
reasonable separation
between men and women, isn?t it possible to divide the area up there (Temple
Mount)?

Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: Razi - if the situation was
normal and if the two sides ? both on the Arab side and the Israeli side ?
there was a leadership that was brave and serious, that can make decisions
and is prepared to engage in somewhat revolutionary thinking, then of course
it could be.

More than that. Above Solomon?s Stables ? where years ago a huge mosque was
built underground, it is possible to build a synagogue. But that would be
if the situation was normal and there was someone to talk to.

But when you have leaders on both sides who are timid - they don?t have the
guts to make any significant changes - they only want quiet so that they can
go to sleep and make sure that the day passed quietly - there's nothing to
talk about.


View the original article here

Tuesday, 6 August 2013

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives. War
returns to Iraq August 06, 2013

+++SOURCE: Egypt Independent via Egypt Daily News 6 Aug.?13:?Exclusive:
Obama agrees to meeting with Brotherhood, sources say?,Reuters
SUBJECT: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives
U.S. President Barack Obama has agreed to meet with Muslim Brotherhood
representatives at the White House, sources told Egypt Independent.

Obama would reportedly meet with Brotherhood officials to "hear their
opinion" on developments in Egypt, in the presence of Turkish diplomats.

[IMRA: Function of Turkish diplomats; millionaire Malek has strong Turkish
business connections.]

Egypt Independent heard from sources inside the Muslim Brotherhood that
Islamist-linked billionaire Hassen Malek requested a meeting through Obama's
office manager.

The meeting with Turkish officials is expected to take place this month.

Turkish diplomats are expected to push for Mohamed Morsy's reinstatement as
Egyptian president, sources said, if not that the Muslim Brotherhood would
be assured of political survival following a month-long violent stand-off
with the armed forces in the wake of Morsy's overthrow.

Over 300 people have been reported killed since army chief and Defense
Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced Morsy's ouster on 3 July.

The U.S. has repeatedly supported the Muslim Brotherhood's ascendancy in
Egypt, researcher Mohamed Hasanein Heikahl said.

While a number of Brotherhood leaders have publicly criticized the U.S.
stance, accusing the Obama administration of "playing a role in Morsy's
overthrow," they are said to be hoping for a shift as tentative talks
continue with Egypt's interim administration

+++SOURCE: Jordan Times 6 Aug.,?13:Cafes shut, sports fields empty as war
returns to Iraq?, Reuters
SUBJECT: ?War returns to Iraq?
QUOTE:?fears of return to full-blown sectarian conflict in a country where
ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have yet to find a
stable way of sharing power?
EXCERPTS:BAGHDAD ?. . . .Iraqis have endured extreme violence for years,
but since the start of 2013 the intensity of attacks on civilians has
dramatically increased, reversing a trend that had seen the country grow
more peaceful.

Attacks have spread to some of the few places left for public entertainment,
turning Baghdad into a giant fortified prison of concrete blast walls, where
once again few now dare to socialise in public.

The attacks have raised fears of a return to full-blown sectarian conflict
in a country where ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have
yet to find a stable way of sharing power.

More than 1,000 Iraqis were killed in July, the highest monthly death toll
since 2008, the United Nations said last week.

The past four months have all had higher death tolls than any in the five
years before April, leading the interior ministry to declare last week that
Iraq was now once again in ?open war?, 18 months after US troops pulled out.

Most of the violence has been perpetrated by the Iraqi wing of Al Qaeda, the
strict Sunni Muslim jihadi group which was defeated by US forces and their
allies in 2006-2007 but has been reborn this year to battle the Shiite-led
government.

. . . Sectarian tensions have also escalated as a result of the civil war
in neighbouring Syria, where Iraq?s Al Qaeda branch has merged with a
powerful Sunni Islamist rebel force fighting to overthrow a leader backed by
Shiite Iran.

?Insurgents now are changing rules of the game,? said Ali Al Bahadli, a
former Iraqi army general and military analyst who works as an adviser to
the ministry of defence.

?With the recent attacks of cafes and football pitches, the message is
directed at civilians is that security forces are unable to protect you.?

Cafes close doors

Security analysts say the Sunni insurgents are targeting cafes and football
pitches as a way to undermine the Shiite-led government of Prime Minister
Nouri Maliki, wrecking its claims to have restored normal life after a
decade of war.

Recent bombings have targeted men playing in local soccer fixtures and
watching matches, after spates of attacks on Sunni and Shiite mosques,
markets and the security forces. According to figures from the interior
ministry, around 37 caf?s across Iraq have been attacked since April.

People have begun to avoid public places like cafes and busy markets,
fearing from bombs and suicide attacks. After an easing of violence in the
past few years led places to reopen, many cafes have now closed again after
losing customers.

. . .

?With more security measures cutting Baghdad into pieces, attacks on cafes,
mosques and sport areas, we feel we?re living deadlocked inside homes,? said
ceramics artist Mahir Samarrai, who used to haunt the cafes in eastern
Baghdad, where men sip strong coffee, puff on water pipes and discuss the
day.

Amateur football players are also targets, with dozens killed in recent
months.

. . ..

The interior ministry has stepped up security near football pitches, cafes
and mosques to try to prevent more attacks.

The cafes are not only targeted by the bombs of the Sunni insurgency, but
are also under pressure from smaller hardline Shiite militias, who try to
close them by force.

The Shiite militias, who warn of practices they see as going against their
strict interpretation of Islam, were also behind a campaign targeting
alcohol sellers in Baghdad which killed 12 people in May.

The militias have been emboldened by the success of Shiite religious parties
which have risen in power since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

?. Prime Minister Maliki . . .?The government will not tolerate militias
and gangs that violate freedom of people in order to impose their corrupted
opinions under various pretexts,? he said on his website.
=========
Sue Lerner - Associate, IMRA


View the original article here

Attacks decline 20 percent in July

Israel Security Agency
Terror Data and Trends
Monthly Summary ? July 2013
http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/July13report-en.aspx

July 2013 saw a decline in the number of terror attacks: 82 attacks as
opposed to 103 in June. The main decline is noted in Judea, Samaria and
Jerusalem: 50 attacks were carried out in Judea and Samaria as opposed to 60
in June; in Jerusalem 26 attacks were executed in July as opposed to 39 in
June.

On the other hand, a slight increase in the number of attacks is noted in
the Gaza Strip: 5 attacks as opposed to 4 in June. In addition, a rocket
attack was executed from Sinai: two rockets were launched against Eilat.

One Israeli was moderately wounded as a result of a stabbing attack (July
16) near Nablus Gate, Jerusalem.

Data regarding terror attacks in July 2013

Following is a regional distribution of attacks:

5 attack from the Gaza Strip (4 in June); 50 attacks in the Judea and
Samaria (60 in June); 26 attacks in Jerusalem (39 in June); 1 attack from
Sinai.

Jerusalem and the Judea and Samaria area: Most attacks executed in July (60
out of 76) were in the form of firebombs (June: 88 out of 99).

Distribution of attacks according to regions and pattern profile:

Following is a distribution of attacks in July 2013 according to regions:

The Gaza Strip ? 5 attacks: 5 rocket launchings.

Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem ? 76 attacks: 11 IED (7 in Jerusalem); 4 small
arms shootings; 1 stabbing (in Jerusalem); 60 firebombs (18 in Jerusalem).

Sinai ? 1 attack: 2 rocket launchings.

High-trajectory launchings from Gaza Strip and Sinai
Throughout July 2013 7 rockets were launched towards Israel (in 6 attacks):

5 from the Gaza Strip, and 2 from Sinai toward Eilat. Compared to June: 5
rocket launchings (in 3 attacks).


View the original article here

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the Temple Mount would be shared

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the
Temple Mount would be shared
Interviewed on IDF Radio 5 August 2013
[IMRA translation]
http://youtu.be/DrwoOwh9mXU

Program host Razi Barkai: With an area of 144 dunam, in contrast to the
very small area of the Western Wall Plaza, where it is be possible to make a
reasonable separation
between men and women, isn?t it possible to divide the area up there (Temple
Mount)?

Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: Razi - if the situation was
normal and if the two sides ? both on the Arab side and the Israeli side ?
there was a leadership that was brave and serious, that can make decisions
and is prepared to engage in somewhat revolutionary thinking, then of course
it could be.

More than that. Above Solomon?s Stables ? where years ago a huge mosque was
built underground, it is possible to build a synagogue. But that would be
if the situation was normal and there was someone to talk to.

But when you have leaders on both sides who are timid - they don?t have the
guts to make any significant changes - they only want quiet so that they can
go to sleep and make sure that the day passed quietly - there's nothing to
talk about.


View the original article here

July Peace Index: Support national referendum, oppose deal

The Peace Index ? July 2013
(N=602), 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the Arab sector
28?30.7.2013
http://www.peaceindex.org/files/The%20Peace%20Index%20Data%20%20July%202013(2).pdf

1. What is your position on holding peace negotiations between Israel and
the
Palestinian Authority?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly in favor 35.8 (29.5) [71.6]
2. Somewhat in favor 29.9 (31.8) [19.3]
3. Somewhat opposed 9.2 (10.4) [2.6]
4. Strongly opposed 19.9 (22.7) [3.6]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.2 (5.6) [2.9]

2. Do you believe or not believe that negotiations between Israel and the
Palestinian Authority will lead to peace between Israel and the Palestinians
in the coming years?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly believe 6.6 (4.5) [18.4]
2. Somewhat believe 23.7 (21.2) [38.3]
3. Somewhat don?t believe 23.0 (22.9) [23.7]
4. Don?t believe at all 42.6 (47.5) [14.9]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.0 (3.9) [4.7]

3. If a peace agreement is reached with the Palestinians that includes an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements,
in your opinion, would there or would there not be a need for a national
referendum to approve the agreement, or should the decision be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There is a need for a referendum 63.5 (62.0) [71.9]
2. There is no need for a referendum. The decision should be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset 31.9 (33.9) [20.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.7 (4.1) [8.1]

4. If a referendum is held, do you think that all Israeli citizens without
distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum? Or should this right be limited to Jewish citizens only?

General Public (Jews [Arabs]
1. All citizens, Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum 52.1 (45.8) [87.8]
2. Only Jewish citizens should have the right to vote in the referendum
41.9 (48.6) [3.9]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.0 (5.6) [8.3]

5. If a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli citizens, Jews
and Arabs, in your assessment would there or would there not be majority
support of a peace agreement with the Palestinians that would include an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There would be majority support of the agreement 33.7 (29.4)
[58.2]
2. There would not be majority support of the agreement 54.3 (58.0)
[33.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 12.0 (12.5) [8.8]

6. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry recently achieved a breakthrough and
convinced the Israelis and the Palestinians to begin a negotiation process
in Washington under US sponsorship. What, in your opinion, are the chances
that the renewed negotiations will lead to a peace agreement between the two
sides?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very high chances 4.7 (2.7) [16.3]
2. Moderately high chances 17.6 (15.4) [30.3]
3. Moderately low chances 37.2 (39.4) [24.3]
4. Very low chances 36.2 (39.7) [16.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.3 (2.8) [12.8]

7. Does the Palestinian Authority truly want to resume peace negotiations
or not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 13.7 (6.2) [56.0]
2. I think it wants to 23.9 (23.0) [29.2]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 24.1 (27.6) [4.1]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 31.8 (36.4) [5.8]
5. Don?t know / No answer 6.4 (6.7) [4.9]

8. Does the Israeli government truly want to resume peace negotiations or
not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 25.0 (22.9) [36.8]
2. I think it wants to 37.5 (40.3) [21.5]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 20.1 (20.3) [19.2]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 11.6 (11.2) [14.2]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.8 (5.3) [8.3]

9. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that
Israel?s security will be ensured?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 19.3 (21.6) [6.0]
2. Moderately trust 36.2 (38.5) [23.2]
3. Don?t trust so much 22.8 (20.5) [36.1]
4. Don?t trust at all 18.4 (16.8) [27.4]
5. Don?t know / No answer 3.3 (2.6) [7.2]

10. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that,
to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace treaty will be signed?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 13.9 (15.6) [4.0]
2. Moderately trust 31.6 (32.2) [27.8]
3. Don?t trust so much 27.4 (26.7) [31.3]
4. Don?t trust at all 21.8 (20.7) [28.1]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.4 (4.8) [8.8]

11. If Israel and the Palestinians reach an understanding and a permanent
peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and declaration
of the end of the conflict by the Palestinians, in return for this peace
agreement, would you support or not support each of the following?

11.1 Withdrawal to the 1967 borders with territorial swaps

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 38.4 (32.4) [72.1]
2. Would not support 55.5 (62.5) [15.4]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.2 (5.1) [12.5]

11.2 Transfer of the Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian
Authority, and a special arrangement for the holy places

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 43.9 (42.1) [54.6]
2. Would not support 47.6 (50.3) [32.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 8.5 (7.6) [13.2]

11.3 An evacuation of settlements, except for Ariel, Maaleh Adumim, and the
settlement blocs

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 44.3 (40.0) [68.7]
2. Would not support 51.8 (57.6) [19.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 3.9 (2.4) [12.1]

11.4 Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, permitting the
return of a small number of Palestinian refugees and financial compensation
for others

General Public (Jews)
[Arabs]
1. Would support 28.4 (18.8) [82.8]
2. Would not support 66.7 (76.7) [9.6]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.9 (4.5) [7.6]

12. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Labor Party join the Netanyahu government immediately to
support the process from within?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 25.9 (20.6) [56.2]
2. I think it should 25.4 (27.3) [14.9]
3. I think it should not 17.9 (19.7) [7.9]
4. I?m sure it should not 13.8 (16.1) [1.0]
5. Don?t know / No answer 16.9 (16.3) [20.0]

13. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Habayit Hayehudi party headed by Naftali Bennett leave the
government immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if
successful, will undoubtedly entail the evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 20.1 (19.7) [22.1]
2. I think it should 14.0 (13.2) [18.9]
3. I think it should not 23.2 (23.5) [21.6]
4. I?m sure it should not 24.4 (27.3) [8.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 18.2 (16.3) [29.1]

14. When you think about the recent elections for the Chief Rabbinate, how
would you characterize them on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ?very clean?
and 5 being ?very corrupt??

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very clean 6.2 (6.8) [2.7]
2. 5.1 (5.0) [5.6]
3. Medium 24.2 (23.2) [29.9]
4. 14.9 (14.0) [20.1]
5. Very corrupt 25.9 (27.6) [16.6]
6. Don?t know / No answer 23.7 (23.5) [25.2]

15. What effect will the results of the Chief Rabbinate elections have on
the status of the Chief Rabbinate in eyes of the Jewish population as a
whole?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. It will not have an effect 29.2 (31.3) [17.2]
2. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will increase 19.3 (19.1) [20.6]
3. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will decrease 25.4 (26.9) [16.8]
4. Don?t know / No answer 26.1 (22.7) [45.4]

The Peace Index: July 2 2013

Date Published: 06/08/2013
Survey dates: 28/07/2013 - 30/07/2013
The July Index
http://www.peaceindex.org/indexMonthEng.aspx?num=254

Assessing the chances of the peace talks ? U.S. Secretary of State John
Kerry?s success in achieving a breakthrough and convincing Israeli and
Palestinian decision-makers to resume peace talks has not convinced the
majority of the Israeli Jewish public that the renewed negotiations will
lead to a peace agreement. Only about one-fifth (18%) rate the chances of
the talks producing a peace agreement as high or very high, while the
majority (80%) sees the chances as moderately low or very low. The Arab
public is much more optimistic, though here too doubts are considerable: 47%
assess the chances of getting to a peace agreement as high or very high
compared to 41% who view them as low or very low. A segmentation of the
responses of the Jewish public by voting in the recent Knesset elections
shows that only among Meretz voters is there a majority (65%) that sees high
or very high chances that the talks will bear fruit.

The sincerity of the sides ? The Jewish public?s high level of pessimism
about the negotiations? chances of success is undoubtedly connected to its
widespread opinion (64%) that the Palestinian leadership does not genuinely
want to resume these talks. Regarding the Israeli government, the response
of the Jewish public is in the opposite direction: 63% say the Israeli
government really does want to resume the talks. On this question, too, the
Arab public is more optimistic about both leaderships: a large majority
(85%) of the Arab public is sure or thinks that the Palestinian leadership
sincerely wants to resume peace talks; a smaller majority (58%) thinks or is
sure this is true of the Israeli government as well. A segmentation by
voting shows that the highest rate of those believing that the Israeli
government is sincere is found among Yesh Atid voters (73%). Regarding the
sincerity of the Palestinian side, only among Meretz voters does a majority
believe that the Palestinian Authority is sincere (76.5%).

Netanyahu?s conduct of the negotiations ? It appears that the Jewish public
makes a distinction between the position of the Israeli government and the
motives of the prime minister. A majority (60%) indeed trusts Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu to conduct the negotiations such that Israel?s security
will be safeguarded. But when asked whether Netanyahu will conduct the
negotiations such that ?to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace
treaty will be signed,? the Jewish public splits into two equal camps: 48%
trust him on this score and 47% do not. The Arab public does not trust
Netanyahu in either regard: 63.5% do not trust him to conduct the
negotiations such that Israel?s security will be ensured, and 59% do not
trust him to conduct the negotiation such that, to the extent that it
depends on Israel, the talks will lead to peace.

Readiness for concessions ? The findings of this survey indicate that the
positions of the Jewish public on the terms of a peace agreement do not bode
well for the chances of the negotiations? success. Even given the terms that
we presented??Israel and the Palestinians will reach an understanding and a
permanent peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and a Palestinian
declaration of the end of the conflict??the majority of Jewish respondents,
to different extents, is not prepared to concede to the Palestinians on any
of the four problems that stand at the heart of the conflict. Some 77%
oppose Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, with a small
number of Palestinian refugees being allowed to return and financial
compensation for others; 62.5% oppose a withdrawal to the 1967 borders with
land swaps; 58% oppose evacuating settlements except for Ariel, Maaleh
Adumim, and the settlement blocs; and 50% oppose transferring the Arab
neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special
arrangement for the holy places. Among these four no?s, the greatest
opposition is on the issue of the right of return and the least is on the
Jerusalem issue. In the Arab public there is (variable) majority support for
concessions on all four of the issues, with the largest majority supporting
Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return while offering the
possibility of a limited number of refugees to return to Israel (82%), and
the smallest majority (55%) supporting the transfer of Arab neighborhoods of
Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special arrangement for the
holy places. The latter finding may be because some of the respondents are
Arab residents of East Jerusalem who do not want to be under PA sovereignty.

Support for a referendum ? In the past, we have always found majority
support for a referendum to ratify a peace agreement, should one be
attained. This time we also asked if a peace agreement is reached that
includes a withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of
settlements, is there a need to approve it in a referendum or should the
decision be left to the government and the Knesset? This time, as in the
past, a clear majority of the Jewish public (62%) affirmed that if peace is
reached a referendum should be held. In the Arab public, the rate of support
for a referendum is even higher at 72%.

Who should take part in the referendum? On the question of whether all
Israeli citizens without distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the
right to vote in the referendum, opinions among Jewish respondents are
divided between those who support granting the right to everyone (46%) and a
slightly higher rate who think that only Jewish citizens should be granted
the right to vote in the referendum (49%). Among the Arabs, a very large
majority (88%) think the right to vote in the referendum should be given to
all Israeli citizens. A segmentation of the answers of Jewish respondents by
voting in the latest Knesset elections reveals that only among Kadima,
Labor, and Meretz voters does a majority support giving the right to all
Israeli citizens without distinction (54.5%, 64%, and 83% respectively). A
segmentation of the responses by self-definition of religiosity in the
Jewish public turned up large disparities: only 13% of those who defined
themselves as Haredim favor participation of all citizens in the referendum,
33% of religious respondents, 31% of religious-traditional respondents, 46%
of nonreligious-traditional respondents, and 60% of secular respondents.

Likely results of the referendum ? The prevailing opinion in the Jewish
public (58%) is that if a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli
citizens, Jews and Arabs, there would not be majority support for a peace
agreement that includes an Israeli withdrawal from the territories and
evacuation of settlements. In the Arab public, however, exactly the same
rate thinks that if a referendum of all citizens were to be held, there
would be majority support for a peace agreement. A cross-tabulation of the
responses of the Jewish public regarding the anticipated referendum results
and their responses regarding who should participate in the referendum shows
that of those who think that a majority would support the agreement, the
majority (57%) support the participation of all Israeli citizens?including
Arabs?in the referendum. However, among those who think that a majority
would not support the agreement if all Israeli citizens took part in the
referendum, only 40% support Arab participation in the referendum.

Join or quit the government because of peace talks? ? A plurality (48%) of
the Jewish public (vs. 35%) thinks that the Labor Party should join the
Netanyahu government immediately so as to support the effort to reach a
peace agreement from within. Seventy-one percent of the Arab public thinks
the same. Among those voters who voted for Labor in the recent elections,
68% think Labor should join the government immediately for this purpose.
However, only a minority of the Jewish public (33%) thinks that the Habayit
Hayehudi party, headed by Naftali Bennett, should leave the government
immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if successful, will
undoubtedly entail evacuating settlements. Among Arab respondents, the
highest rate (41%) would want Habayit Hayehudi to leave the government;
their main motivation, however, is most likely not the motivation presented
in the question but rather a desire to weaken the right-wing nature of the
government. A segmentation of the responses of Habayit Hayehudi voters to
this question shows a problematic internal division: 46% are in favor of
leaving the government immediately while 49% are against it.

The elections for the Chief Rabbinate ? Things happen so fast in Israel that
thee elections for the Chief Rabbinate may already seem to be history.
Still, it is noteworthy that according to the results of the survey, only
12% of the Jewish public think the latest elections to the Chief Rabbinate
were ?clean,? 23% placed them midway between clean and corrupt, while the
majority (42%) characterized them as corrupt. (About 25%, an especially high
rate in our surveys, said that they did not know or declined to answer the
question.) As for how the elections for Chief Rabbi will influence the
status of the institution of the Chief Rabbinate, 31% think the elections
will not have an influence, 27% believe the status of the Chief Rabbinate
will be weakened by the elections, and 19% expect the status of the Chief
Rabbinate to be strengthened. (Again about one-fourth did not know or
declined to respond.)

The Negotiations Index for July, 2013
The Peace Index project includes ongoing monitoring of the Israeli public's
attitudes towards peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority. The monthly Negotiation Index is comprised of two questions, one
focusing on public support for peace negotiations and the other on the
degree to which the public believes that such talks will actually lead to
peace. The aggregated replies to these two questions are calculated,
combined, and standardized on a scale of 0-100, in which 0 represents total
lack of support for negotiations and lack of belief in their potential to
bear fruit, and 100 represents total support for the process and belief in
its potential. Each month, the Negotiations Index presents two distinct
findings, one for the general Israeli population and the other for Jewish
Israelis.

Negotiations Index: General sample: 46.4; Jewish sample: 42.3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Peace Index is a project of the Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict
Resolution at Tel Aviv University and the Israel Democracy Institute. The
survey was conducted by telephone on July 28-30, 2013, by the Midgam
Research Institute. The survey was conducted in Hebrew, Arabic, and Russian
and included 602 respondents, 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the
Arab sector. A calculation was done such that the total of the respondents
would constitute a representative national sample of the adult population
aged 18 and over. The margin of error is ? 4.5%.


View the original article here

Iranian President Rohani, Turkish PM Erdogan talk on phone

President Rohani, Turkey's Erdogan talk on the phone
Date: 05/08/2013 Time: 22:19
http://217.25.54.55/en/News/80763880/Politic/President_Rohani,_Turkey's_Erdogan_talk_on_the_phone:

Tehran, Aug 5, IRNA – President Hassan Rohani, in a telephone conversation
with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Teyyip Erdogan on Monday, said all should
do their best to establish peace and stability in the region.

According to Presidential Office Website, Rohani thanked Erdogan for his
call and said,' Based on our Islamic and human obligations, we should all
try hard to stop bloodshed in the region.'

'Cooperation between Iran and Turkey would be very effective in performing
our Islamic and human duties,' said the president.

'Iran's new government would take big steps to broaden relations with Turkey
on bilateral, regional and international levels,' added President Rohani.

Prime Minister Erdogan, on behalf of himself, government and people of
Turkey, congratulated Rohani on his election as the new president of Iran
and expressed his interest to visit Tehran.

Referring to Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu's presence in Tehran
to participate in President Rohani's oath-taking ceremony, Erdogan called
for more development in Teharn, Ankara relations.

The two officials also congratulated each other in adavance, on the advent
of Eid al-Fitr, marking the end of holy month of Ramazan.

1771**1771


View the original article here

Attacks decline 20 percent in July

Israel Security Agency
Terror Data and Trends
Monthly Summary ? July 2013
http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/July13report-en.aspx

July 2013 saw a decline in the number of terror attacks: 82 attacks as
opposed to 103 in June. The main decline is noted in Judea, Samaria and
Jerusalem: 50 attacks were carried out in Judea and Samaria as opposed to 60
in June; in Jerusalem 26 attacks were executed in July as opposed to 39 in
June.

On the other hand, a slight increase in the number of attacks is noted in
the Gaza Strip: 5 attacks as opposed to 4 in June. In addition, a rocket
attack was executed from Sinai: two rockets were launched against Eilat.

One Israeli was moderately wounded as a result of a stabbing attack (July
16) near Nablus Gate, Jerusalem.

Data regarding terror attacks in July 2013

Following is a regional distribution of attacks:

5 attack from the Gaza Strip (4 in June); 50 attacks in the Judea and
Samaria (60 in June); 26 attacks in Jerusalem (39 in June); 1 attack from
Sinai.

Jerusalem and the Judea and Samaria area: Most attacks executed in July (60
out of 76) were in the form of firebombs (June: 88 out of 99).

Distribution of attacks according to regions and pattern profile:

Following is a distribution of attacks in July 2013 according to regions:

The Gaza Strip ? 5 attacks: 5 rocket launchings.

Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem ? 76 attacks: 11 IED (7 in Jerusalem); 4 small
arms shootings; 1 stabbing (in Jerusalem); 60 firebombs (18 in Jerusalem).

Sinai ? 1 attack: 2 rocket launchings.

High-trajectory launchings from Gaza Strip and Sinai
Throughout July 2013 7 rockets were launched towards Israel (in 6 attacks):

5 from the Gaza Strip, and 2 from Sinai toward Eilat. Compared to June: 5
rocket launchings (in 3 attacks).


View the original article here

(Audio) SENIOR OFFICIAL: ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN

Israel Radio News Broadcast 08:00 6 August 2013
ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN
[Translation by IMRA]

For audio:
http://youtu.be/b5k9Y0yStAs

Voice of Israel from Jerusalem. Good morning, the hour is 8:00 and the
following is the news from Malachi Chizkiya:

A senior source in Israel doubts the intentions of the American
administration to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.at all costs.

The source told our diplomatic commentator Chico Menashe that the behavior
of the administration towards Syria contradicts the declarations of
President Obama and teaches Israel that it cannot rely on American promises.

The state source added that Israel can carry out a military operation
against Iran also without American military support but such an action would
be of a lower quality than an American action.

Our commentator notes that in Israel there is concern that direct
negotiations will open between Washington and Teheran that will bring to an
easing of sanctions in exchange for Iranian concessions that will not meet
the demands set by Israel.


View the original article here

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives. War
returns to Iraq August 06, 2013

+++SOURCE: Egypt Independent via Egypt Daily News 6 Aug.?13:?Exclusive:
Obama agrees to meeting with Brotherhood, sources say?,Reuters
SUBJECT: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives
U.S. President Barack Obama has agreed to meet with Muslim Brotherhood
representatives at the White House, sources told Egypt Independent.

Obama would reportedly meet with Brotherhood officials to "hear their
opinion" on developments in Egypt, in the presence of Turkish diplomats.

[IMRA: Function of Turkish diplomats; millionaire Malek has strong Turkish
business connections.]

Egypt Independent heard from sources inside the Muslim Brotherhood that
Islamist-linked billionaire Hassen Malek requested a meeting through Obama's
office manager.

The meeting with Turkish officials is expected to take place this month.

Turkish diplomats are expected to push for Mohamed Morsy's reinstatement as
Egyptian president, sources said, if not that the Muslim Brotherhood would
be assured of political survival following a month-long violent stand-off
with the armed forces in the wake of Morsy's overthrow.

Over 300 people have been reported killed since army chief and Defense
Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced Morsy's ouster on 3 July.

The U.S. has repeatedly supported the Muslim Brotherhood's ascendancy in
Egypt, researcher Mohamed Hasanein Heikahl said.

While a number of Brotherhood leaders have publicly criticized the U.S.
stance, accusing the Obama administration of "playing a role in Morsy's
overthrow," they are said to be hoping for a shift as tentative talks
continue with Egypt's interim administration

+++SOURCE: Jordan Times 6 Aug.,?13:Cafes shut, sports fields empty as war
returns to Iraq?, Reuters
SUBJECT: ?War returns to Iraq?
QUOTE:?fears of return to full-blown sectarian conflict in a country where
ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have yet to find a
stable way of sharing power?
EXCERPTS:BAGHDAD ?. . . .Iraqis have endured extreme violence for years,
but since the start of 2013 the intensity of attacks on civilians has
dramatically increased, reversing a trend that had seen the country grow
more peaceful.

Attacks have spread to some of the few places left for public entertainment,
turning Baghdad into a giant fortified prison of concrete blast walls, where
once again few now dare to socialise in public.

The attacks have raised fears of a return to full-blown sectarian conflict
in a country where ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have
yet to find a stable way of sharing power.

More than 1,000 Iraqis were killed in July, the highest monthly death toll
since 2008, the United Nations said last week.

The past four months have all had higher death tolls than any in the five
years before April, leading the interior ministry to declare last week that
Iraq was now once again in ?open war?, 18 months after US troops pulled out.

Most of the violence has been perpetrated by the Iraqi wing of Al Qaeda, the
strict Sunni Muslim jihadi group which was defeated by US forces and their
allies in 2006-2007 but has been reborn this year to battle the Shiite-led
government.

. . . Sectarian tensions have also escalated as a result of the civil war
in neighbouring Syria, where Iraq?s Al Qaeda branch has merged with a
powerful Sunni Islamist rebel force fighting to overthrow a leader backed by
Shiite Iran.

?Insurgents now are changing rules of the game,? said Ali Al Bahadli, a
former Iraqi army general and military analyst who works as an adviser to
the ministry of defence.

?With the recent attacks of cafes and football pitches, the message is
directed at civilians is that security forces are unable to protect you.?

Cafes close doors

Security analysts say the Sunni insurgents are targeting cafes and football
pitches as a way to undermine the Shiite-led government of Prime Minister
Nouri Maliki, wrecking its claims to have restored normal life after a
decade of war.

Recent bombings have targeted men playing in local soccer fixtures and
watching matches, after spates of attacks on Sunni and Shiite mosques,
markets and the security forces. According to figures from the interior
ministry, around 37 caf?s across Iraq have been attacked since April.

People have begun to avoid public places like cafes and busy markets,
fearing from bombs and suicide attacks. After an easing of violence in the
past few years led places to reopen, many cafes have now closed again after
losing customers.

. . .

?With more security measures cutting Baghdad into pieces, attacks on cafes,
mosques and sport areas, we feel we?re living deadlocked inside homes,? said
ceramics artist Mahir Samarrai, who used to haunt the cafes in eastern
Baghdad, where men sip strong coffee, puff on water pipes and discuss the
day.

Amateur football players are also targets, with dozens killed in recent
months.

. . ..

The interior ministry has stepped up security near football pitches, cafes
and mosques to try to prevent more attacks.

The cafes are not only targeted by the bombs of the Sunni insurgency, but
are also under pressure from smaller hardline Shiite militias, who try to
close them by force.

The Shiite militias, who warn of practices they see as going against their
strict interpretation of Islam, were also behind a campaign targeting
alcohol sellers in Baghdad which killed 12 people in May.

The militias have been emboldened by the success of Shiite religious parties
which have risen in power since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

?. Prime Minister Maliki . . .?The government will not tolerate militias
and gangs that violate freedom of people in order to impose their corrupted
opinions under various pretexts,? he said on his website.
=========
Sue Lerner - Associate, IMRA


View the original article here

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the Temple Mount would be shared

(Audio) Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: If leadership had guts the
Temple Mount would be shared
Interviewed on IDF Radio 5 August 2013
[IMRA translation]
http://youtu.be/DrwoOwh9mXU

Program host Razi Barkai: With an area of 144 dunam, in contrast to the
very small area of the Western Wall Plaza, where it is be possible to make a
reasonable separation
between men and women, isn?t it possible to divide the area up there (Temple
Mount)?

Former Jerusalem police chief Aryeh Amit: Razi - if the situation was
normal and if the two sides ? both on the Arab side and the Israeli side ?
there was a leadership that was brave and serious, that can make decisions
and is prepared to engage in somewhat revolutionary thinking, then of course
it could be.

More than that. Above Solomon?s Stables ? where years ago a huge mosque was
built underground, it is possible to build a synagogue. But that would be
if the situation was normal and there was someone to talk to.

But when you have leaders on both sides who are timid - they don?t have the
guts to make any significant changes - they only want quiet so that they can
go to sleep and make sure that the day passed quietly - there's nothing to
talk about.


View the original article here

Attacks decline 20 percent in July

Israel Security Agency
Terror Data and Trends
Monthly Summary ? July 2013
http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/EnTerrorData/Reports/Pages/July13report-en.aspx

July 2013 saw a decline in the number of terror attacks: 82 attacks as
opposed to 103 in June. The main decline is noted in Judea, Samaria and
Jerusalem: 50 attacks were carried out in Judea and Samaria as opposed to 60
in June; in Jerusalem 26 attacks were executed in July as opposed to 39 in
June.

On the other hand, a slight increase in the number of attacks is noted in
the Gaza Strip: 5 attacks as opposed to 4 in June. In addition, a rocket
attack was executed from Sinai: two rockets were launched against Eilat.

One Israeli was moderately wounded as a result of a stabbing attack (July
16) near Nablus Gate, Jerusalem.

Data regarding terror attacks in July 2013

Following is a regional distribution of attacks:

5 attack from the Gaza Strip (4 in June); 50 attacks in the Judea and
Samaria (60 in June); 26 attacks in Jerusalem (39 in June); 1 attack from
Sinai.

Jerusalem and the Judea and Samaria area: Most attacks executed in July (60
out of 76) were in the form of firebombs (June: 88 out of 99).

Distribution of attacks according to regions and pattern profile:

Following is a distribution of attacks in July 2013 according to regions:

The Gaza Strip ? 5 attacks: 5 rocket launchings.

Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem ? 76 attacks: 11 IED (7 in Jerusalem); 4 small
arms shootings; 1 stabbing (in Jerusalem); 60 firebombs (18 in Jerusalem).

Sinai ? 1 attack: 2 rocket launchings.

High-trajectory launchings from Gaza Strip and Sinai
Throughout July 2013 7 rockets were launched towards Israel (in 6 attacks):

5 from the Gaza Strip, and 2 from Sinai toward Eilat. Compared to June: 5
rocket launchings (in 3 attacks).


View the original article here

Iranian President Rohani, Turkish PM Erdogan talk on phone

President Rohani, Turkey's Erdogan talk on the phone
Date: 05/08/2013 Time: 22:19
http://217.25.54.55/en/News/80763880/Politic/President_Rohani,_Turkey's_Erdogan_talk_on_the_phone:

Tehran, Aug 5, IRNA – President Hassan Rohani, in a telephone conversation
with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Teyyip Erdogan on Monday, said all should
do their best to establish peace and stability in the region.

According to Presidential Office Website, Rohani thanked Erdogan for his
call and said,' Based on our Islamic and human obligations, we should all
try hard to stop bloodshed in the region.'

'Cooperation between Iran and Turkey would be very effective in performing
our Islamic and human duties,' said the president.

'Iran's new government would take big steps to broaden relations with Turkey
on bilateral, regional and international levels,' added President Rohani.

Prime Minister Erdogan, on behalf of himself, government and people of
Turkey, congratulated Rohani on his election as the new president of Iran
and expressed his interest to visit Tehran.

Referring to Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu's presence in Tehran
to participate in President Rohani's oath-taking ceremony, Erdogan called
for more development in Teharn, Ankara relations.

The two officials also congratulated each other in adavance, on the advent
of Eid al-Fitr, marking the end of holy month of Ramazan.

1771**1771


View the original article here

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood

Excerpts: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives. War
returns to Iraq August 06, 2013

+++SOURCE: Egypt Independent via Egypt Daily News 6 Aug.?13:?Exclusive:
Obama agrees to meeting with Brotherhood, sources say?,Reuters
SUBJECT: Obama agrees to meet with Muslim Brotherhood representatives
U.S. President Barack Obama has agreed to meet with Muslim Brotherhood
representatives at the White House, sources told Egypt Independent.

Obama would reportedly meet with Brotherhood officials to "hear their
opinion" on developments in Egypt, in the presence of Turkish diplomats.

[IMRA: Function of Turkish diplomats; millionaire Malek has strong Turkish
business connections.]

Egypt Independent heard from sources inside the Muslim Brotherhood that
Islamist-linked billionaire Hassen Malek requested a meeting through Obama's
office manager.

The meeting with Turkish officials is expected to take place this month.

Turkish diplomats are expected to push for Mohamed Morsy's reinstatement as
Egyptian president, sources said, if not that the Muslim Brotherhood would
be assured of political survival following a month-long violent stand-off
with the armed forces in the wake of Morsy's overthrow.

Over 300 people have been reported killed since army chief and Defense
Minister Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced Morsy's ouster on 3 July.

The U.S. has repeatedly supported the Muslim Brotherhood's ascendancy in
Egypt, researcher Mohamed Hasanein Heikahl said.

While a number of Brotherhood leaders have publicly criticized the U.S.
stance, accusing the Obama administration of "playing a role in Morsy's
overthrow," they are said to be hoping for a shift as tentative talks
continue with Egypt's interim administration

+++SOURCE: Jordan Times 6 Aug.,?13:Cafes shut, sports fields empty as war
returns to Iraq?, Reuters
SUBJECT: ?War returns to Iraq?
QUOTE:?fears of return to full-blown sectarian conflict in a country where
ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have yet to find a
stable way of sharing power?
EXCERPTS:BAGHDAD ?. . . .Iraqis have endured extreme violence for years,
but since the start of 2013 the intensity of attacks on civilians has
dramatically increased, reversing a trend that had seen the country grow
more peaceful.

Attacks have spread to some of the few places left for public entertainment,
turning Baghdad into a giant fortified prison of concrete blast walls, where
once again few now dare to socialise in public.

The attacks have raised fears of a return to full-blown sectarian conflict
in a country where ruling Shiites and minority Sunni Muslims and Kurds have
yet to find a stable way of sharing power.

More than 1,000 Iraqis were killed in July, the highest monthly death toll
since 2008, the United Nations said last week.

The past four months have all had higher death tolls than any in the five
years before April, leading the interior ministry to declare last week that
Iraq was now once again in ?open war?, 18 months after US troops pulled out.

Most of the violence has been perpetrated by the Iraqi wing of Al Qaeda, the
strict Sunni Muslim jihadi group which was defeated by US forces and their
allies in 2006-2007 but has been reborn this year to battle the Shiite-led
government.

. . . Sectarian tensions have also escalated as a result of the civil war
in neighbouring Syria, where Iraq?s Al Qaeda branch has merged with a
powerful Sunni Islamist rebel force fighting to overthrow a leader backed by
Shiite Iran.

?Insurgents now are changing rules of the game,? said Ali Al Bahadli, a
former Iraqi army general and military analyst who works as an adviser to
the ministry of defence.

?With the recent attacks of cafes and football pitches, the message is
directed at civilians is that security forces are unable to protect you.?

Cafes close doors

Security analysts say the Sunni insurgents are targeting cafes and football
pitches as a way to undermine the Shiite-led government of Prime Minister
Nouri Maliki, wrecking its claims to have restored normal life after a
decade of war.

Recent bombings have targeted men playing in local soccer fixtures and
watching matches, after spates of attacks on Sunni and Shiite mosques,
markets and the security forces. According to figures from the interior
ministry, around 37 caf?s across Iraq have been attacked since April.

People have begun to avoid public places like cafes and busy markets,
fearing from bombs and suicide attacks. After an easing of violence in the
past few years led places to reopen, many cafes have now closed again after
losing customers.

. . .

?With more security measures cutting Baghdad into pieces, attacks on cafes,
mosques and sport areas, we feel we?re living deadlocked inside homes,? said
ceramics artist Mahir Samarrai, who used to haunt the cafes in eastern
Baghdad, where men sip strong coffee, puff on water pipes and discuss the
day.

Amateur football players are also targets, with dozens killed in recent
months.

. . ..

The interior ministry has stepped up security near football pitches, cafes
and mosques to try to prevent more attacks.

The cafes are not only targeted by the bombs of the Sunni insurgency, but
are also under pressure from smaller hardline Shiite militias, who try to
close them by force.

The Shiite militias, who warn of practices they see as going against their
strict interpretation of Islam, were also behind a campaign targeting
alcohol sellers in Baghdad which killed 12 people in May.

The militias have been emboldened by the success of Shiite religious parties
which have risen in power since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003.

?. Prime Minister Maliki . . .?The government will not tolerate militias
and gangs that violate freedom of people in order to impose their corrupted
opinions under various pretexts,? he said on his website.
=========
Sue Lerner - Associate, IMRA


View the original article here

(Audio) SENIOR OFFICIAL: ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN

Israel Radio News Broadcast 08:00 6 August 2013
ISRAEL DOUBTS CAN RELY ON US TO STOP NUCLEAR IRAN
[Translation by IMRA]

For audio:
http://youtu.be/b5k9Y0yStAs

Voice of Israel from Jerusalem. Good morning, the hour is 8:00 and the
following is the news from Malachi Chizkiya:

A senior source in Israel doubts the intentions of the American
administration to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.at all costs.

The source told our diplomatic commentator Chico Menashe that the behavior
of the administration towards Syria contradicts the declarations of
President Obama and teaches Israel that it cannot rely on American promises.

The state source added that Israel can carry out a military operation
against Iran also without American military support but such an action would
be of a lower quality than an American action.

Our commentator notes that in Israel there is concern that direct
negotiations will open between Washington and Teheran that will bring to an
easing of sanctions in exchange for Iranian concessions that will not meet
the demands set by Israel.


View the original article here

July Peace Index: Support national referendum, oppose deal

The Peace Index ? July 2013
(N=602), 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the Arab sector
28?30.7.2013
http://www.peaceindex.org/files/The%20Peace%20Index%20Data%20%20July%202013(2).pdf

1. What is your position on holding peace negotiations between Israel and
the
Palestinian Authority?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly in favor 35.8 (29.5) [71.6]
2. Somewhat in favor 29.9 (31.8) [19.3]
3. Somewhat opposed 9.2 (10.4) [2.6]
4. Strongly opposed 19.9 (22.7) [3.6]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.2 (5.6) [2.9]

2. Do you believe or not believe that negotiations between Israel and the
Palestinian Authority will lead to peace between Israel and the Palestinians
in the coming years?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly believe 6.6 (4.5) [18.4]
2. Somewhat believe 23.7 (21.2) [38.3]
3. Somewhat don?t believe 23.0 (22.9) [23.7]
4. Don?t believe at all 42.6 (47.5) [14.9]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.0 (3.9) [4.7]

3. If a peace agreement is reached with the Palestinians that includes an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements,
in your opinion, would there or would there not be a need for a national
referendum to approve the agreement, or should the decision be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There is a need for a referendum 63.5 (62.0) [71.9]
2. There is no need for a referendum. The decision should be left in the
hands of the government and the Knesset 31.9 (33.9) [20.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.7 (4.1) [8.1]

4. If a referendum is held, do you think that all Israeli citizens without
distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum? Or should this right be limited to Jewish citizens only?

General Public (Jews [Arabs]
1. All citizens, Jews and Arabs, should have the right to vote in the
referendum 52.1 (45.8) [87.8]
2. Only Jewish citizens should have the right to vote in the referendum
41.9 (48.6) [3.9]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.0 (5.6) [8.3]

5. If a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli citizens, Jews
and Arabs, in your assessment would there or would there not be majority
support of a peace agreement with the Palestinians that would include an
Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. There would be majority support of the agreement 33.7 (29.4)
[58.2]
2. There would not be majority support of the agreement 54.3 (58.0)
[33.0]
3. Don?t know / No answer 12.0 (12.5) [8.8]

6. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry recently achieved a breakthrough and
convinced the Israelis and the Palestinians to begin a negotiation process
in Washington under US sponsorship. What, in your opinion, are the chances
that the renewed negotiations will lead to a peace agreement between the two
sides?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very high chances 4.7 (2.7) [16.3]
2. Moderately high chances 17.6 (15.4) [30.3]
3. Moderately low chances 37.2 (39.4) [24.3]
4. Very low chances 36.2 (39.7) [16.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 4.3 (2.8) [12.8]

7. Does the Palestinian Authority truly want to resume peace negotiations
or not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 13.7 (6.2) [56.0]
2. I think it wants to 23.9 (23.0) [29.2]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 24.1 (27.6) [4.1]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 31.8 (36.4) [5.8]
5. Don?t know / No answer 6.4 (6.7) [4.9]

8. Does the Israeli government truly want to resume peace negotiations or
not truly want to resume peace negotiations?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it wants to 25.0 (22.9) [36.8]
2. I think it wants to 37.5 (40.3) [21.5]
3. I think it doesn?t want to 20.1 (20.3) [19.2]
4. I?m sure it doesn?t want to 11.6 (11.2) [14.2]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.8 (5.3) [8.3]

9. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that
Israel?s security will be ensured?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 19.3 (21.6) [6.0]
2. Moderately trust 36.2 (38.5) [23.2]
3. Don?t trust so much 22.8 (20.5) [36.1]
4. Don?t trust at all 18.4 (16.8) [27.4]
5. Don?t know / No answer 3.3 (2.6) [7.2]

10. To what extent do you trust or not trust Prime Minister Netanyahu to
conduct the negotiations with the Palestinian Authority in such a way that,
to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace treaty will be signed?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Strongly trust 13.9 (15.6) [4.0]
2. Moderately trust 31.6 (32.2) [27.8]
3. Don?t trust so much 27.4 (26.7) [31.3]
4. Don?t trust at all 21.8 (20.7) [28.1]
5. Don?t know / No answer 5.4 (4.8) [8.8]

11. If Israel and the Palestinians reach an understanding and a permanent
peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and declaration
of the end of the conflict by the Palestinians, in return for this peace
agreement, would you support or not support each of the following?

11.1 Withdrawal to the 1967 borders with territorial swaps

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 38.4 (32.4) [72.1]
2. Would not support 55.5 (62.5) [15.4]
3. Don?t know / No answer 6.2 (5.1) [12.5]

11.2 Transfer of the Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian
Authority, and a special arrangement for the holy places

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 43.9 (42.1) [54.6]
2. Would not support 47.6 (50.3) [32.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 8.5 (7.6) [13.2]

11.3 An evacuation of settlements, except for Ariel, Maaleh Adumim, and the
settlement blocs

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Would support 44.3 (40.0) [68.7]
2. Would not support 51.8 (57.6) [19.2]
3. Don?t know / No answer 3.9 (2.4) [12.1]

11.4 Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, permitting the
return of a small number of Palestinian refugees and financial compensation
for others

General Public (Jews)
[Arabs]
1. Would support 28.4 (18.8) [82.8]
2. Would not support 66.7 (76.7) [9.6]
3. Don?t know / No answer 4.9 (4.5) [7.6]

12. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Labor Party join the Netanyahu government immediately to
support the process from within?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 25.9 (20.6) [56.2]
2. I think it should 25.4 (27.3) [14.9]
3. I think it should not 17.9 (19.7) [7.9]
4. I?m sure it should not 13.8 (16.1) [1.0]
5. Don?t know / No answer 16.9 (16.3) [20.0]

13. If Israeli-Palestinian peace talks indeed begin, in your opinion should
or should not the Habayit Hayehudi party headed by Naftali Bennett leave the
government immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if
successful, will undoubtedly entail the evacuation of settlements?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. I?m sure it should 20.1 (19.7) [22.1]
2. I think it should 14.0 (13.2) [18.9]
3. I think it should not 23.2 (23.5) [21.6]
4. I?m sure it should not 24.4 (27.3) [8.3]
5. Don?t know / No answer 18.2 (16.3) [29.1]

14. When you think about the recent elections for the Chief Rabbinate, how
would you characterize them on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ?very clean?
and 5 being ?very corrupt??

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. Very clean 6.2 (6.8) [2.7]
2. 5.1 (5.0) [5.6]
3. Medium 24.2 (23.2) [29.9]
4. 14.9 (14.0) [20.1]
5. Very corrupt 25.9 (27.6) [16.6]
6. Don?t know / No answer 23.7 (23.5) [25.2]

15. What effect will the results of the Chief Rabbinate elections have on
the status of the Chief Rabbinate in eyes of the Jewish population as a
whole?

General Public (Jews) [Arabs]
1. It will not have an effect 29.2 (31.3) [17.2]
2. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will increase 19.3 (19.1) [20.6]
3. The Chief Rabbinate?s status will decrease 25.4 (26.9) [16.8]
4. Don?t know / No answer 26.1 (22.7) [45.4]

The Peace Index: July 2 2013

Date Published: 06/08/2013
Survey dates: 28/07/2013 - 30/07/2013
The July Index
http://www.peaceindex.org/indexMonthEng.aspx?num=254

Assessing the chances of the peace talks ? U.S. Secretary of State John
Kerry?s success in achieving a breakthrough and convincing Israeli and
Palestinian decision-makers to resume peace talks has not convinced the
majority of the Israeli Jewish public that the renewed negotiations will
lead to a peace agreement. Only about one-fifth (18%) rate the chances of
the talks producing a peace agreement as high or very high, while the
majority (80%) sees the chances as moderately low or very low. The Arab
public is much more optimistic, though here too doubts are considerable: 47%
assess the chances of getting to a peace agreement as high or very high
compared to 41% who view them as low or very low. A segmentation of the
responses of the Jewish public by voting in the recent Knesset elections
shows that only among Meretz voters is there a majority (65%) that sees high
or very high chances that the talks will bear fruit.

The sincerity of the sides ? The Jewish public?s high level of pessimism
about the negotiations? chances of success is undoubtedly connected to its
widespread opinion (64%) that the Palestinian leadership does not genuinely
want to resume these talks. Regarding the Israeli government, the response
of the Jewish public is in the opposite direction: 63% say the Israeli
government really does want to resume the talks. On this question, too, the
Arab public is more optimistic about both leaderships: a large majority
(85%) of the Arab public is sure or thinks that the Palestinian leadership
sincerely wants to resume peace talks; a smaller majority (58%) thinks or is
sure this is true of the Israeli government as well. A segmentation by
voting shows that the highest rate of those believing that the Israeli
government is sincere is found among Yesh Atid voters (73%). Regarding the
sincerity of the Palestinian side, only among Meretz voters does a majority
believe that the Palestinian Authority is sincere (76.5%).

Netanyahu?s conduct of the negotiations ? It appears that the Jewish public
makes a distinction between the position of the Israeli government and the
motives of the prime minister. A majority (60%) indeed trusts Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu to conduct the negotiations such that Israel?s security
will be safeguarded. But when asked whether Netanyahu will conduct the
negotiations such that ?to the extent that it depends on Israel, a peace
treaty will be signed,? the Jewish public splits into two equal camps: 48%
trust him on this score and 47% do not. The Arab public does not trust
Netanyahu in either regard: 63.5% do not trust him to conduct the
negotiations such that Israel?s security will be ensured, and 59% do not
trust him to conduct the negotiation such that, to the extent that it
depends on Israel, the talks will lead to peace.

Readiness for concessions ? The findings of this survey indicate that the
positions of the Jewish public on the terms of a peace agreement do not bode
well for the chances of the negotiations? success. Even given the terms that
we presented??Israel and the Palestinians will reach an understanding and a
permanent peace agreement that includes security arrangements for Israel, a
demilitarized Palestinian state, international guarantees, and a Palestinian
declaration of the end of the conflict??the majority of Jewish respondents,
to different extents, is not prepared to concede to the Palestinians on any
of the four problems that stand at the heart of the conflict. Some 77%
oppose Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return, with a small
number of Palestinian refugees being allowed to return and financial
compensation for others; 62.5% oppose a withdrawal to the 1967 borders with
land swaps; 58% oppose evacuating settlements except for Ariel, Maaleh
Adumim, and the settlement blocs; and 50% oppose transferring the Arab
neighborhoods of Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special
arrangement for the holy places. Among these four no?s, the greatest
opposition is on the issue of the right of return and the least is on the
Jerusalem issue. In the Arab public there is (variable) majority support for
concessions on all four of the issues, with the largest majority supporting
Israeli recognition in principle of the right of return while offering the
possibility of a limited number of refugees to return to Israel (82%), and
the smallest majority (55%) supporting the transfer of Arab neighborhoods of
Jerusalem to the Palestinian Authority with a special arrangement for the
holy places. The latter finding may be because some of the respondents are
Arab residents of East Jerusalem who do not want to be under PA sovereignty.

Support for a referendum ? In the past, we have always found majority
support for a referendum to ratify a peace agreement, should one be
attained. This time we also asked if a peace agreement is reached that
includes a withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and an evacuation of
settlements, is there a need to approve it in a referendum or should the
decision be left to the government and the Knesset? This time, as in the
past, a clear majority of the Jewish public (62%) affirmed that if peace is
reached a referendum should be held. In the Arab public, the rate of support
for a referendum is even higher at 72%.

Who should take part in the referendum? On the question of whether all
Israeli citizens without distinction, both Jews and Arabs, should have the
right to vote in the referendum, opinions among Jewish respondents are
divided between those who support granting the right to everyone (46%) and a
slightly higher rate who think that only Jewish citizens should be granted
the right to vote in the referendum (49%). Among the Arabs, a very large
majority (88%) think the right to vote in the referendum should be given to
all Israeli citizens. A segmentation of the answers of Jewish respondents by
voting in the latest Knesset elections reveals that only among Kadima,
Labor, and Meretz voters does a majority support giving the right to all
Israeli citizens without distinction (54.5%, 64%, and 83% respectively). A
segmentation of the responses by self-definition of religiosity in the
Jewish public turned up large disparities: only 13% of those who defined
themselves as Haredim favor participation of all citizens in the referendum,
33% of religious respondents, 31% of religious-traditional respondents, 46%
of nonreligious-traditional respondents, and 60% of secular respondents.

Likely results of the referendum ? The prevailing opinion in the Jewish
public (58%) is that if a referendum were to be held today among all Israeli
citizens, Jews and Arabs, there would not be majority support for a peace
agreement that includes an Israeli withdrawal from the territories and
evacuation of settlements. In the Arab public, however, exactly the same
rate thinks that if a referendum of all citizens were to be held, there
would be majority support for a peace agreement. A cross-tabulation of the
responses of the Jewish public regarding the anticipated referendum results
and their responses regarding who should participate in the referendum shows
that of those who think that a majority would support the agreement, the
majority (57%) support the participation of all Israeli citizens?including
Arabs?in the referendum. However, among those who think that a majority
would not support the agreement if all Israeli citizens took part in the
referendum, only 40% support Arab participation in the referendum.

Join or quit the government because of peace talks? ? A plurality (48%) of
the Jewish public (vs. 35%) thinks that the Labor Party should join the
Netanyahu government immediately so as to support the effort to reach a
peace agreement from within. Seventy-one percent of the Arab public thinks
the same. Among those voters who voted for Labor in the recent elections,
68% think Labor should join the government immediately for this purpose.
However, only a minority of the Jewish public (33%) thinks that the Habayit
Hayehudi party, headed by Naftali Bennett, should leave the government
immediately so as not to participate in a process that, if successful, will
undoubtedly entail evacuating settlements. Among Arab respondents, the
highest rate (41%) would want Habayit Hayehudi to leave the government;
their main motivation, however, is most likely not the motivation presented
in the question but rather a desire to weaken the right-wing nature of the
government. A segmentation of the responses of Habayit Hayehudi voters to
this question shows a problematic internal division: 46% are in favor of
leaving the government immediately while 49% are against it.

The elections for the Chief Rabbinate ? Things happen so fast in Israel that
thee elections for the Chief Rabbinate may already seem to be history.
Still, it is noteworthy that according to the results of the survey, only
12% of the Jewish public think the latest elections to the Chief Rabbinate
were ?clean,? 23% placed them midway between clean and corrupt, while the
majority (42%) characterized them as corrupt. (About 25%, an especially high
rate in our surveys, said that they did not know or declined to answer the
question.) As for how the elections for Chief Rabbi will influence the
status of the institution of the Chief Rabbinate, 31% think the elections
will not have an influence, 27% believe the status of the Chief Rabbinate
will be weakened by the elections, and 19% expect the status of the Chief
Rabbinate to be strengthened. (Again about one-fourth did not know or
declined to respond.)

The Negotiations Index for July, 2013
The Peace Index project includes ongoing monitoring of the Israeli public's
attitudes towards peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian
Authority. The monthly Negotiation Index is comprised of two questions, one
focusing on public support for peace negotiations and the other on the
degree to which the public believes that such talks will actually lead to
peace. The aggregated replies to these two questions are calculated,
combined, and standardized on a scale of 0-100, in which 0 represents total
lack of support for negotiations and lack of belief in their potential to
bear fruit, and 100 represents total support for the process and belief in
its potential. Each month, the Negotiations Index presents two distinct
findings, one for the general Israeli population and the other for Jewish
Israelis.

Negotiations Index: General sample: 46.4; Jewish sample: 42.3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Peace Index is a project of the Evens Program in Mediation and Conflict
Resolution at Tel Aviv University and the Israel Democracy Institute. The
survey was conducted by telephone on July 28-30, 2013, by the Midgam
Research Institute. The survey was conducted in Hebrew, Arabic, and Russian
and included 602 respondents, 502 from the Jewish sector and 100 from the
Arab sector. A calculation was done such that the total of the respondents
would constitute a representative national sample of the adult population
aged 18 and over. The margin of error is ? 4.5%.


View the original article here